Without going to his book for a ton of examples the clearest judgement he gives is in response to neo Marxist post modernists and to those seeking to change their sexual categorization. His response to both of those groups is that we shouldn’t alter what is natural because that’s how we are made…(which is a tautology) that we are good how we are in those ways and altering those ways will not be good for us. That’s definitely a judgement value, regarding nature and tradition; whether it has to do with power structures or sexual socialization.

His book is pretty full of these kinds of claims, be it let children skateboard or that we should be “how we are supposed to be” because there’s some older story/myth that he thinks is proof of how we are made to be a certain way and therefore we should be that way (as he sees it).